![oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations](http://liquorlicense.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Apply-for-Liquor-License-Freestate-266x266.jpg)
- Oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations full#
- Oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations code#
Stephanie Bice wants to lower a tax rate. Fleming The Journal Recordğebruary 1, 2017Đ
Oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations full#
It's not the full story, either, but just saying that and letting the customer think "dumb liquor laws" makes the business look better than "we don't want to maintain public restrooms".īice seeks lower liquor consumption tax rateīy: Molly M. So strictly speaking "it's against the law" is not totally incorrect. Were they to remodel or open the employee restroom to the public, however, they would have to follow the new code.
Oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations code#
Since the code is frequently updated, you'll also discover that some things that were fine in the past are no longer fine now, but buildings that conformed to the past code were grandfathered in. However, if you look at the IPC (which is what Oklahoma follows) you will see different requirements for employee vs public restrooms, where they must be located, what sort of facilities must be provided, and so on. If you go through Oklahoma's (or anyone else's for that matter) liquor laws you won't find anything even remotely suggesting that the public must not be allowed to use the employee restroom. I don't think there's anything new, because there's not an issue. In a worst-case scenario however, what happens with SQ 792? Is it possible that the court strikes down certain aspects of it, or will the state have to go back to the drawing board and pass another ballot measure? The law shouldn't be designed to protect a business model that was unfair to begin with and should have been done away with in 1959. If a liquor store makes most of its profit off beer and wine and wanted to open more than two locations, is anything preventing them from getting out of hard liquor sales and thus falling under the same regulations as grocers and convenience stores?Īs long as liquor stores can sell hard liquor and grocery and convenience stores can't, I don't see how this holds up as unfair treatment. This would be the case, except for the fact that liquor stores are still the only entities that can sell hard liquor. The RLAO is acting like liquor stores and grocery/convenience stores are equal entities and the law favors the grocers.
![oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations oklahoma liquor license fraternal organizations](https://946e583539399c301dc7-100ffa5b52865b8ec92e09e9de9f4d02.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/14826/2469380.jpg)
It's actually more fair than SQ 791, which would have said that grocery and convenience stores within a certain distance from a liquor store could not sell beer/wine. I don't see how the lawsuit has a leg to stand on.